1.6K
Publications
78.7K
Citations
2.3K
Authors
874
Institutions
Non-Price Abuse Paradigm
2000 - 2008
During 2000–2008, research emphasizes enforcement risk as a central determinant of dominance strategies, reconfiguring how firms exercise market power beyond price effects and elevating non-price anti-competitive practices such as tying, loyalty discounts, discrimination, and strategic communication. The period also highlights how takeover dynamics, governance mechanisms, and ownership concentration interact with regulatory constraints to shape bargaining positions, while merger structure and market design in two-sided and vertical contexts influence competitive outcomes under scrutiny. Historical Significance: Influential works formalized administrable rules for excessive pricing and demonstrated the enduring role of vertical integration, communications, and collusion in abuses of dominance. They introduced frameworks to assess non-price coordination and highlighted how information exchange and strategic alliances can sustain market power, while offering policy guidance to curb anti-competitive practices through targeted governance and regulatory design.
• Regulatory presence and enforcement risk reconfigure dominance strategies, shaping cartel pricing, tying, and vertical arrangements to anticipate detection and sanctions in enforcement environments. [5] [8] [11] [12] [7]
• Ownership concentration and private-benefit incentives influence antitrust policy and market outcomes, as capital-market development and privatizations shape control and strategic leverage. [1] [13] [12] [4]
• Non-price anti-competitive strategies—loyalty discounts, tying, discrimination, and collusive communication—are central to diversified enforcement views beyond price effects. [7] [2] [8] [20] [10]
• Takeover dynamics and governance mechanisms—defenses, lockups, and minority shareholder activism—shape acquisition bargaining and competitive outcomes under strategic power. [9] [3] [15]
• Merger structure and market design in two-sided and vertical contexts determine competitive outcomes via auction formats, merger choices, and regulatory constraints. [4] [17] [11] [18]
Platform Power and Foreclosure
2009 - 2015
Platform Power Governance
2016 - 2022